Federal authorities confirmed Thursday afternoon that U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents shot two people during an immigration enforcement operation in Portland, Oregon, intensifying scrutiny of the Trump administration’s expanded immigration crackdown. The shooting marked the second violent confrontation involving federal immigration agents in just two days, following the fatal shooting of a woman in Minneapolis during a similar operation. Together, the incidents have amplified national debate over the scope, methods, and consequences of aggressive immigration enforcement, particularly in cities that have adopted sanctuary policies. As details emerged, the Portland incident quickly became a flashpoint, illustrating the collision between federal authority and local resistance amid a climate of fear, anger, and political polarization.

According to law enforcement sources, the individuals shot in Portland were a 33-year-old Spanish-speaking man and his wife, both residents of the city. Agents were reportedly attempting to carry out an arrest as part of an immigration enforcement action when the situation escalated. Local reporting indicated that the couple’s truck “lunged toward” CBP agents, a claim that federal officials say prompted agents to discharge their weapons out of concern for officer safety. Portland police responded to the scene and found two people suffering from gunshot wounds. Both victims reportedly fled before officers arrived, driving to a relative’s home where they later sought medical treatment. Authorities confirmed that both individuals were alive as of Thursday evening, though the severity of their injuries was not publicly disclosed.

Portland Police Chief Bob Day addressed the incident with a call for restraint, acknowledging heightened emotions in the community. Referencing the recent fatal shooting in Minneapolis, Day urged residents to remain calm while investigators worked to establish the facts. His statement reflected the delicate position of local law enforcement caught between federal operations and community outrage. In Portland, where city leadership has frequently criticized federal immigration tactics, the shooting deepened existing tensions and raised concerns about public safety, accountability, and the risk of further violence as raids continue.

The Portland shooting came just one day after a far more deadly encounter in Minneapolis, where an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent fatally shot 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good during an enforcement action. That killing sparked immediate protests, drawing crowds into the streets and resulting in clashes with law enforcement. Good’s death quickly became a national symbol for critics of the administration’s immigration policies, who described her as an activist and community member caught up in an overly aggressive operation. Federal officials, however, presented a starkly different account, asserting that Good posed a direct threat to agents and that the shooting was justified.

According to the Department of Homeland Security, Good was affiliated with “ICE Watch,” a network of activist groups that monitor, track, and attempt to disrupt immigration enforcement in sanctuary cities. DHS officials said Good had followed ICE agents to multiple locations on the day she was killed and was attempting to block a roadway when the fatal confrontation occurred. A video of the incident shows an agent attempting to open Good’s car door before the vehicle accelerates, followed by another officer firing multiple shots at close range. DHS characterized the incident as a necessary response to a credible threat to officer safety, citing prior incidents in which agents were injured after being dragged by vehicles during enforcement actions.

Political reaction to the two shootings has been swift and sharply divided. Portland Mayor Keith Wilson condemned the shooting in his city and called for an immediate suspension of federal immigration operations there. He warned that constitutional protections were being eroded and that the use of force by federal agents was placing residents in danger. Wilson argued that Portland should not be treated as a testing ground for militarized enforcement and accused the administration of escalating tensions without regard for community safety. His comments echoed broader concerns voiced by local officials in other sanctuary cities, who have criticized federal raids as destabilizing and inflammatory.

Federal leaders, by contrast, defended the enforcement campaign and rejected calls to scale it back. Vice President J.D. Vance delivered a forceful response Thursday night, sharply criticizing media coverage that portrayed Renee Nicole Good as an innocent bystander. Vance accused left-wing activist groups of employing what he called “domestic terror techniques” to obstruct federal law enforcement, including blocking vehicles, doxing agents, and provoking confrontations. He argued that such actions endangered officers and the public alike and said the administration would no longer tolerate political interference with immigration enforcement. Framing the campaign as a mandate from voters, Vance insisted that the federal government would continue to enforce immigration law aggressively, even as investigations into the shootings in Minneapolis and Portland move forward and the nation braces for the possibility of further confrontations.