White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt recently delivered a pointed critique of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi over her extensive stock trading activities, which many view as emblematic of the conflicts inherent when lawmakers profit from financial markets while holding public office. During a press briefing, Leavitt read aloud a detailed list of trades made by Pelosi and her husband, Paul, asserting that their returns outpaced Warren Buffett and nearly every major hedge fund on Wall Street. According to Leavitt, this extraordinary performance has ignited national conversation and prompted proposals for stricter rules regarding stock trading by members of Congress. Leavitt underscored that this situation exemplifies why legislative reform is urgently needed, framing Pelosi as the reason Congress is even considering a ban on stock trades for elected officials.

Leavitt highlighted stark figures to illustrate the perceived disparity between public service and private gain. Pelosi earns an annual salary of $174,000, yet her net worth is estimated at approximately $413 million. In 2024 alone, her portfolio reportedly grew 70%, surpassing the returns of prominent hedge funds and even doubling the gains of Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway. Leavitt emphasized that these numbers underscore the potential for conflict when public officials leverage insider access, privileged information, or political connections to accumulate wealth. The White House’s position, she said, aligns with public outrage over these trades, supporting legislative measures to prevent officials from enriching themselves at the expense of constituents. Her statements suggested that reform is both a moral and practical imperative, ensuring lawmakers prioritize public service over private profit.

Senator Josh Hawley, R-Missouri, has emerged as a leading advocate for legislative change, sponsoring a bill designed to ban members of Congress from trading individual stocks. The bill, formally known as the Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments (PELOSI) Act, aims to address widespread concerns about conflicts of interest and insider trading within the legislative branch. The measure initially included an exemption allowing the president to trade stocks, but Hawley joined Senate Democrats in rejecting this carve-out, sparking criticism from former President Donald Trump. On social media, Trump labeled Hawley a “second-tier Senator,” highlighting the political tension surrounding the legislation. Hawley clarified that the bill applies only to future presidents, while current trading practices by President Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance remain exempt, emphasizing the measure’s forward-looking focus on ethical governance.

Republican efforts to require reporting of Pelosi’s stock trades were blocked in Congress, despite bipartisan recognition of the public’s frustration with perceived conflicts of interest. Leavitt underscored that Pelosi’s extraordinary trading performance exemplifies why stricter rules are necessary, framing the legislation as a response to systemic issues rather than a personal attack. Hawley echoed these concerns, stating that members of Congress should focus on serving their constituents rather than engaging in day trading that exploits privileged knowledge. He emphasized that Americans have repeatedly witnessed politicians benefiting financially through information not available to the general public, undermining trust in the legislative process.

Support for the PELOSI Act spans both parties. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and other Republicans, along with some Democrats, have expressed approval, indicating broad recognition of the need for reform. The bill would prohibit members of Congress and their spouses from buying, selling, or holding individual stocks while serving in office. Instead, lawmakers would be permitted to invest only in diversified mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), or U.S. Treasury bonds. Advocates argue that these measures prevent personal financial gain from influencing legislative decisions, promoting transparency, and protecting the public’s interest in fair governance.

The proposed reforms, according to Leavitt and Hawley, are designed to restore public trust in the legislative system, ensuring elected officials cannot exploit their positions for personal enrichment. By banning stock trades and restricting investments to broadly diversified vehicles, the PELOSI Act aims to remove financial incentives that could compromise policy decisions. Lawmakers argue that public servants must act in good faith on behalf of constituents, free from the temptation to profit from insider knowledge or political influence. With the legislation gaining traction and bipartisan support, advocates see it as a critical step toward ethical governance, reinforcing the principle that members of Congress are stewards of public trust rather than private wealth accumulation.